A United Nations (UN) manager has made controversial statements about the organization's inner workings, shedding light on alleged inefficiency, political bias, and incentives tied to global conflicts.
War as a Source of Profit
In an undercover video released by Project Veritas, Gagan Vaseer, a UN Program Management Officer for innovation and peacekeeping, claimed that war is the only way for UN employees to make significant financial gains. Vaseer stated, "We only make serious money during wars," highlighting what he sees as a perverse incentive structure within the organization.
Political Bias at the UN
Vaseer also alleged that many UN employees are politically biased, favoring certain U.S. presidential candidates over others. According to him, staff preferred Hillary Clinton in past elections and are now rooting for Republican candidate Nikki Haley over former President Donald Trump. This bias, Vaseer claimed, undermines the UN’s stated position of political neutrality.
The UN has historically faced scrutiny for its involvement in U.S. politics, including allegations of favoritism toward leaders who align with its globalist policies.
Criticism of UN Staff and Structure
Vaseer painted a grim picture of the UN’s internal culture, describing the organization as "inefficient" and "outdated." He claimed that most employees are "lazy," unmotivated, and shielded from accountability. “Ninety percent of them are just squatting—they're taking up space,” Vaseer remarked, adding that many staff members remain employed without evaluations or consequences for underperformance.
Challenges in Peacekeeping
While the UN was established in 1945 to promote peace and resolve global conflicts, Vaseer suggested the organization is failing in its mission. He described the UN as an "archaic" institution incapable of addressing ongoing wars effectively. This inefficiency, combined with the financial benefits of prolonged conflict, raises questions about the UN's commitment to its peacekeeping mandate.
U.S. Relations and Leadership Shift
The release of this video coincides with a transition in U.S. leadership at the UN. President-elect Donald Trump has appointed Congresswoman Elise Stefanik as the next U.S. Ambassador to the UN. In a statement, Stefanik pledged to advance Trump’s "America First" agenda on the global stage.
However, Vaseer expressed skepticism about the UN's willingness to cooperate with Trump’s policies, which prioritize U.S. interests over globalist initiatives. This tension highlights ongoing challenges in U.S.-UN relations, which have historically been fraught with disagreements over priorities and policies.
Broader Criticisms of the UN
The United Nations has long faced criticism for being too large and fragmented to effectively address global challenges like poverty, human rights abuses, and conflict resolution. Vaseer echoed these concerns, describing the UN as an "amorphous body of nothingness" that fails to deliver on its promises.
Final Remarks
The revelations from Vaseer’s comments raise critical questions about the UN’s accountability, internal culture, and ability to fulfill its mission. As the organization faces mounting scrutiny, the upcoming leadership changes and global challenges will test its resilience and relevance on the world stage.
Commenti