The Meeting
MSNBC’s "Morning Joe" hosts, Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, recently traveled to Mar-a-Lago to meet with President-elect Donald Trump. The purpose? Reestablish communication to better serve their viewers, according to the hosts. This move comes as a surprise, given the duo's history of harsh criticism toward Trump, including comparing him to Hitler during the campaign.
Brzezinski described the meeting as cordial, stating that Trump was “cheerful” despite their disagreements. She emphasized that the aim was to restart a dialogue akin to how her father, Zbigniew Brzezinski, once communicated with world leaders during tense times.
Why It Matters?
The meeting underscores a broader question about the role of journalists in maintaining access to political figures, even amid criticism. Scarborough defended their decision, stating that their goal is to provide insights rather than normalize Trump’s behavior.
Trump’s Take
Trump acknowledged the meeting in a Fox News Digital interview, expressing appreciation for the effort to open communication. He emphasized his willingness to engage with the press, though he cautioned that unfair treatment could lead to a halt in such interactions.
Backlash and Reactions
The meeting sparked diverse reactions:
Critics like Jeff Jarvis, a retired journalism professor, called it “a disgusting show of obeisance.”
On The View, co-host Sunny Hostin questioned the need to “kiss the ring,” emphasizing the importance of a free press holding power accountable.
Conservative commentators like Buck Sexton and Greta Van Susteren criticized the hosts, labeling the meeting as groveling and surrendering.
The Ratings Factor
"Morning Joe," like many post-election news programs, has seen a ratings dip as liberal audiences disengage. This meeting may be an attempt to reengage viewers or adapt to changing dynamics in the political landscape.
The Bigger Picture
This interaction highlights the ongoing tension between access journalism and holding public figures accountable. While Scarborough and Brzezinski argue that dialogue is essential, critics see it as a potential compromise of journalistic integrity.
For now, the impact of this meeting on both the show and its audience remains to be seen.
Comments