Fed Governor Lisa Cook Sues Trump Over Firing
- The New York Editorial Desk - Arif
- Aug 28
- 2 min read
Tone & Political Bias: Moderately Left-Leaning
Why: The coverage highlights legal protections of Federal Reserve independence and frames Trump’s action as politically motivated, while presenting Cook’s defense in detail.
Cook Challenges Trump’s Removal Order
Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook has filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump after he attempted to remove her from office. The case, lodged in federal court in Washington, D.C., argues that the president lacks authority to dismiss her under the law governing the Federal Reserve.
Cook had previously stated she would not resign and questioned the legality of Trump’s directive. Her lawsuit now seeks confirmation that she remains a member of the Fed’s Board of Governors.
Trump’s Reason for Firing
Earlier this week, Trump announced on social media that he was firing Cook. He cited allegations that she made false statements on mortgage applications, calling her conduct “deceitful and potentially criminal.”
White House spokesman Kush Desai later reinforced the claim, stating the president acted lawfully because Cook was “credibly accused of lying in financial documents” while holding a sensitive financial oversight role.
Mortgage Allegations from Trump Ally
The allegations originate from Federal Housing Finance Agency director Bill Pulte, a close Trump ally. Pulte accused Cook of mortgage fraud, pointing to two home loans she obtained in 2021 before joining the Fed.
According to Pulte, Cook declared both properties — one in Michigan and one in Georgia — as her primary residence. Such declarations often secure more favorable loan terms. He suggested this amounted to misrepresentation.
Cook’s Defense and Legal Argument
Cook’s lawsuit argues that the claims are “unsubstantiated allegations” about private financial transactions that occurred before her Senate confirmation as a Fed governor. She maintains that Trump’s move is a pretext to replace her with a political ally and influence the central bank.
Her complaint asserts two main points:
Violation of the Federal Reserve Act: Under U.S. law, Fed governors can only be removed “for cause,” a safeguard designed to preserve the institution’s independence.
Violation of due process rights: Cook claims she was denied fair process and that the accusations are being used to undermine the Fed’s autonomy.
The filing also names Jerome Powell, the Fed’s chair, in case he plays a role in carrying out the termination order. The Federal Reserve has declined to comment.
Broader Context: Trump and the Fed
This lawsuit is the latest in Trump’s ongoing confrontations with the Federal Reserve. The president has repeatedly pressured the Fed and Chair Powell to lower interest rates more quickly, arguing that aggressive cuts would benefit the economy.
Cook’s removal attempt is seen by critics as part of Trump’s broader effort to weaken the central bank’s independence and exert political influence over monetary policy decisions.
What Cook Seeks from Court
Through her lawsuit, Cook is asking the court to:
Reaffirm her status as a sitting governor.
Protect the Fed’s independence from political interference.
Prevent the White House from removing board members without proper legal justification.
The outcome could set a precedent for how much authority the president has over the Federal Reserve’s leadership and could influence the balance of power between the White House and the central bank.
Comments