China Criticizes U.S. Ban on Harvard's International Students
- The New York Editorial Desk - Arif
- May 23
- 2 min read
Tone & Political Bias: Moderately Right-Leaning
Why: The article focuses on the Trump administration’s narrative of national security and campus safety, while portraying Chinese criticism as defensive. The framing aligns with conservative themes of protecting domestic interests and skepticism of elite institutions.
U.S. Revokes Harvard's Ability to Enroll International Students
On May 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revoked Harvard University’s certification to enroll international students. The decision was based on claims that Harvard had failed to maintain a safe environment on campus, citing alleged incidents of intimidation against Jewish students and accusations that the university allowed foreign influence, particularly from the Chinese Communist Party.
This move immediately bars Harvard from accepting new international students. Current international students face visa issues and must either transfer to another institution or leave the country. Over 7,000 student visas are reportedly affected.
Harvard Responds with Legal Action
Harvard has filed a lawsuit challenging the DHS action, calling it unconstitutional and retaliatory. The university argues that it is being unfairly targeted for its perceived liberal stances and claims the ban is politically motivated. It also emphasized the devastating impact the decision would have on thousands of students from around the world.
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order, halting the enforcement of the ban for two weeks while the case is reviewed.
China Condemns the Decision
The Chinese government strongly criticized the U.S. action, stating that it damages the global image of American education and undermines academic cooperation between the two nations. China remains one of the largest sources of international students in the U.S., with many attending institutions like Harvard.
A spokesperson from China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the ban was an overreach and accused the U.S. of politicizing education. The Chinese government urged the U.S. to reconsider its actions and protect the rights of international students.
Hong Kong University Steps In
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) publicly offered unconditional admission to international students affected by the U.S. ban. The university positioned itself as a refuge for those displaced, highlighting its commitment to academic freedom and diversity.
This move is seen by some as an effort to gain global recognition while capitalizing on the reputational damage faced by U.S. institutions.
Uncertainty for Students
Harvard’s international student community now faces a period of deep uncertainty. Many are seeking legal advice, considering deferring enrollment, or transferring to other institutions. Chinese students, in particular, are expressing concern over visa complications and potential surveillance.
Several students have spoken out anonymously, fearing retaliation or further restrictions if they appear in public.
Global Academic Tensions
The ban has drawn criticism from academic leaders and international education organizations, who warn it could discourage global talent from applying to U.S. universities. There is growing concern that the U.S. is using immigration policy as a tool to enforce political ideologies within the education system.
Observers say the development adds to an already tense U.S.-China relationship and may influence future cooperation in scientific research, student exchange programs, and cross-border education initiatives. This situation remains fluid, with ongoing legal challenges and diplomatic discussions expected in the coming weeks.